CHI '95 ProceedingsTopIndexes
Interactive ExperienceTOC

Interactive City Planning Using Multimedia Representation Aids

Michael J. Shiffer


Dept. of Urban Studies & Planning
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 9-514
Cambridge, MA 02139
(617) 253-0782
mshiffer@mit.edu

© ACM

Abstract

This interactive exhibition demonstrates a method of interacting with city planning analysis tools using direct manipulation graphical interfaces. The technology combines maps, interactive video, text, sound, and other forms of data with analytic tools and an associative information structure using a city map as a central metaphor. This allows immediate navigation amongst chunks of related information during city planning meetings. The technology also makes it possible to link descriptive images, such as digital video and sound, to information that would normally be represented quantitatively.

Keywords:

Geographic, direct manipulation, noise, multimedia, maps, implementation, group, decision.

Introduction

City Planning provides a practical context in which to demonstrate how information technology can augment public debate with effective human-computer interfaces [1]. The purpose of this interactive experience is to demonstrate how mutimedia representation aids can be used to provide rich descriptions of otherwise abstract information that describes various urban phenomena. This is accomplished by using visual and audible cues to illustrate the potential impacts of such things as increased automobile traffic, aircraft noise, or large scale development in an urban area.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Research into how technology can augment planning- related conversations has led to the development of a prototype Collaborative Planning System (CPS). The system supports several planning-related activities including: land use analyses, automobile traffic analyses, assessments of visual environments, and illustrations of proposed changes to the visual environments [2,3]. This allows city planners to analyze potential impacts of new developments through the retrieval, integration and comparison of existing and proposed environmental conditions of a selected urban area. The CPS supports a variety of analysis activities, several are described below. Land Use Analysis The study of existing land use patterns is implemented through interactive land use, zoning, and building height maps. Each of these maps consists of transparent color polygons overlaid onto an aerial image of the study area. Summaries of the information represented by these polygons appear as the user selects the areas with a pointing device. As the user moves the pointer around the map, the displayed summary changes to reflect the zoning of the currently selected area. For the zoning and land use maps, the polygons and associated summary displays are color-coded to allow the user to visually distinguish them from other adjacent zoning classifications and land uses. In addition to the color coding, the zoning summaries contain a brief textual description of the zoning classification.

Another description of land use is provided using a building height indicator. As the user points to a building on the map, the height of a selected building is indicated by a vertical bar in a window that also contains a representation of the U.S. Capitol building. When the pointer is moved around the map, the bar inside the window will slide up or down to represent the selected building's height in relation to the Capitol building. The selected building's height (in feet) is also represented numerically below the bar.

Assessments of Visual Environments

To better understand an area under study, it may be necessary to view it from several different perspectives. The ability to analyze the existing visual environment in the study area is made possible through the use of digital video. Several types of shots have been incorporated into the CPS. The three main shot types are fixed position, 360 degree axial view, and navigation.

The fixed position shots allow the user to view a video clip of a particular site from a fixed camera angle. They are symbolized on the visual quality map as arrows that match the direction of the camera's angle. Some of the sites are viewed from several different angles that allow the user to "switch" perspectives so that a subject can be viewed from several vantage points.

The 360 degree axial view allows the user to look completely around from a fixed vantage point. They are represented as circular symbols on the visual quality map. These views are useful for illustrating the environment surrounding a particular location. They allow the user to pan to the left or right by selecting the appropriate arrows at the bottom of the displayed image.

The navigation images allow users to drive or fly through the study area. They are designed to aid visual navigation by enabling the user to view a geographic area from a moving perspective such as that experienced when traveling through a region. Navigation images are represented on the map as linear symbols that represent the routes available to the user. They are illustrated as large arrows in the lower right window of Figure 1.

FIGURE 1 Aerial navigation

Figure 1: Aerial navigation. The controller at the left edge of the "Aerial Views" window, allows the user to control the direction and speed of flight by sliding the pointer towards either end of the controller. The icons represent the camera perspective. The video image in the upper left corner of Figure 1 represents an oblique navigation image of a selected street from an altitude of 500 feet. The controller at the left edge of the "Aerial Views" window, (the upper left window), allows the user to control the direction and speed of flight, by sliding the pointer towards either end of the controller. The user can set the camera angle by selecting one of the icons at the right side of the "Aerial Views" window. The arrows on the icons represent the camera perspective.

Automobile Traffic Analysis

The study of existing automobile traffic flows uses an interactive traffic map that displays values of average daily traffic for selected street links. Traffic data, located in a window containing multiple representations of average daily traffic, is accessed by pointing to an associated street link on the map. In addition to the traditional numeric representation, the average daily traffic values are represented graphically, with a bar; dynamically, with a clip of digital motion video; and audibly, with the level of traffic noise played back at the level experienced in the field. The bar graph's utility becomes apparent as one points to different streets on the projected map, causing the bar to fluctuate. In this manner, users can compare relative levels of traffic to one another more easily.

Illustrations of Proposed Environments

The CPS enables users to qualitatively assess proposed changes to the visual environment by allowing easy access to images of architectural models and artists' renderings. By selecting the appropriate map overlay, a rendering of a proposed development appears at the appropriate geographic location on the base map along with arrows that are linked to various perspective views as shown in Figure 3. Selecting an arrow yields an image of an architectural model or rendering in a separate window, with controls allowing users to navigate around the image by "zooming" or "panning".

These options allow users to inspect the proposed site in three ways. First, they can view the proposal from various perspectives around the site by selecting appropriate arrows linked to the map. Second, users can sequentially move through a series of site images while an associated arrow highlights on the map as each image is displayed. Finally, they can navigate around a specific rendering by zooming or panning with on-screen controls.

CONTINUING RESEARCH ISSUES

The visualization tools contained in collaborative planning systems can empower groups and individuals who have traditionally been informationally disadvantaged due to a lack of technical sophistication. However, just as these tools have the capacity to provide rich and compelling representations of environmental conditions, they have the capacity to provide rich and compelling misrepresentations. Thus, the issue of the relative trustworthiness of the information presented is going to float to the top of future discussions with increasing frequency.

This research opens the door to experimentation with more proactive planning styles using the new computing environment and information infrastructures. It is hoped that the planning process could be democratized using tools such as the Collaborative Planning System to bring data and analyses to a wider audience. Exactly who benefits from such empowerment will depend on the situations in which the technology is implemented.

References

  1. Klosterman, R.E. Evolving Views of Computer-Aided Planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 6, 249-260, 1992.
  2. Shiffer, M.J. A Geographically-Based Multimedia Approach to City Planning, ACM SIGCHI Conference Companion , 265-266, 1994.
  3. Shiffer, M.J. Towards a Collaborative Planning System, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 19, 709-722, 1992.